Insurance Software Development Company

Insurance Software Development

Most insurance platforms weren't designed to move fast. Policy administration systems that take six months to launch a new product. Claims workflows spread across paper, email, and three systems that don't talk to each other. Compliance reports assembled by hand every quarter.
We build insurance software that fixes these at the source: underwriting automation, FNOL and claims processing, policy administration with a real product configurator, AI document intelligence for policies and claims evidence, and compliance for Solvency II, FCA Consumer Duty, and NAIC. We also integrate with Guidewire and Duck Creek when replacing your core isn't the right answer. Fixed cost, scoped before development starts.

See our work
  • Underwriting automation with risk rules engine, bureau data integration, and decisioning audit trail

  • Claims processing from FNOL intake through reserve calculation, adjuster assignment, and settlement

  • Policy administration with product configurator, quote-bind-issue, endorsements, and MTA processing

  • Compliance built in for Solvency II, FCA Consumer Duty, and NAIC model laws

Recent outcomes

Voice AI · Research

Text-based interviews converted to automated phone calls

6× deeper insights

AI Automation · Ops

Manual invoice OCR across 40+ gas stations

20k+ txns day one

Loyalty · Retail

SuperValu & Centra loyalty platform with receipt validation

1,062 users in 4 weeks

SaaS · Logistics

Multi-carrier shipping hub for Indonesian eCommerce

2,000+ shipments yr 1
4.9 / 5 on ClutchSee all work

Recognition

Sound familiar?

  • Claims team manually keying data from paper FNOLs into three systems that don't talk to each other?

  • Policy administration platform that takes 6 months to launch a new product because the system wasn't designed for configurability?

In short

RaftLabs builds custom insurance software for underwriting automation, FNOL and claims processing, policy administration, AI document intelligence, and compliance reporting. We support Solvency II (EU), FCA Consumer Duty (UK), and NAIC model laws (US), and integrate with Guidewire, Duck Creek, and existing core platforms. Engagements typically run $50,000 to $150,000 depending on scope, with delivery in 12 to 20 weeks. Fixed cost is agreed before development starts. Related services include AI for insurance and insurance automation.

Trusted by

Vodafone
Nike
Microsoft
Cisco
T-Mobile
Aldi
Heineken
GE

The gap between insurance software and insurance software that works

Most insurers aren't running on bad software because they don't know better. They're running on it because the switch looked too risky, too expensive, or too slow. We've built insurance software for companies that made that calculation for years and finally ran the numbers on what staying put was costing them.

The pattern is consistent: claims teams manually re-keying data that should flow automatically, compliance reports assembled from spreadsheet extracts the week before a regulatory examination, new products delayed six months because the policy admin system needs a vendor change request. Each one is a solvable engineering problem.

Capabilities

What we build

Underwriting automation

Risk rules engine that encodes your underwriting appetite in configurable business rules, not hardcoded logic that requires a developer to change when appetite shifts. Bureau data integration: ISO, LexisNexis, Verisk, CoreLogic, and credit data sources pulled automatically at quote and written to the risk record with source and timestamp. Decisioning with full audit trail: for every automated bind, decline, or referral, the system records which rules fired, which data inputs triggered them, and what the output was, readable by your compliance team and regulable by an examiner. Referral workflow for submissions outside automated appetite: structured referral queue with the risk data pre-organised so the underwriter reviews a complete risk picture, not a raw submission. Real-time rate calculation from your filed rates and bureau data, with rate change history tracked for regulatory rate filing reconciliation. Output: faster decisions on in-appetite submissions, consistent referral handling on edge cases, and a defensible audit record for every automated decision.

Claims processing (FNOL to settlement)

First notice of loss intake across all channels: web forms, phone transcripts via speech-to-text, emailed loss notices, and mobile FNOL apps, normalised into a single structured claim record regardless of intake channel. Coverage validation at intake: reported loss date checked against policy effective and expiration, reported peril checked against covered causes of loss, reported location checked against insured property, with coverage questions flagged before the claim opens. Reserve calculation logic from your reserve guidelines, triggered at FNOL with automatic reserve setting for straightforward loss types and structured referral for complex losses requiring adjuster review. Adjuster assignment routing by line of business, geographic territory, workload, and complexity tier. Settlement automation for fast-track claims meeting defined eligibility criteria: payment authorisation generated and issued without adjuster intervention for low-value, clear-liability claims. Fraud detection scoring from historical claim patterns, routing high-risk claims to SIU with contributing factors surfaced. Compliance deadline tracking per jurisdiction: acknowledgement deadlines, investigation deadlines, and payment deadlines monitored automatically with escalation before breach. See also: AI for insurance and insurance automation.

Policy administration

Product configurator: define coverage structures, rating factors, endorsements, and exclusions in a configuration layer, not in application code, so your product team can launch new products and modify existing ones without a development cycle. Quote-bind-issue workflow: from applicant data entry through rating, eligibility checking, payment processing, and policy issuance, with each step logged and the issued policy document generated automatically from your template library. Endorsements: mid-term coverage changes processed against the existing policy record, with pro-rata premium adjustment calculated and recorded. Renewals: automated renewal quote generation at configured advance notice intervals, with renewal offers sent to policyholders and renewal processing triggered on acceptance. Mid-term adjustments (MTA): address changes, vehicle swaps, driver additions, and coverage changes processed with premium recalculation and updated policy documents generated. Cancellation and reinstatement: reason-coded cancellations, non-pay lapse handling, and reinstatement processing with back-to-date coverage reinstatement calculation. The platform is designed for configurability over custom code: your operations team changes product rules, your development team builds integrations.

AI document intelligence

Extraction and validation pipelines for the document types insurance operations generate at scale. Policy documents: coverage terms, exclusions, and endorsement data extracted from issued policies and compared against the policy administration record for consistency, flagging discrepancies before they become coverage disputes. Claims evidence: loss notices, repair estimates, medical records, police reports, and adjuster photographs processed through vision models (GPT-4o with vision, Azure Document Intelligence) with structured data extracted and written to the claims record. Medical reports and Explanation of Benefits: ICD codes, procedure codes, provider information, treatment dates, and billed amounts extracted from medical billing documents and EOBs for workers' compensation and health lines. Extraction confidence scoring on every field: high-confidence extractions populate your system directly, low-confidence extractions route to a review queue showing the source text alongside the extracted value so reviewers correct in seconds rather than re-reading the document. Volume: the pipeline processes thousands of documents per day without manual triage. See also: intelligent document processing.

Compliance and regulatory reporting

Compliance built into the software architecture rather than added as an audit layer after the fact. Solvency II (EU): SCR calculation data feeds structured for Pillar 1 quantitative reporting, Pillar 2 governance documentation framework, and Pillar 3 public and supervisory disclosure templates. FCA Consumer Duty (UK): consumer outcome monitoring dashboards tracking price and value, products and services, consumer understanding, and consumer support metrics with the evidence trail required for annual Board attestation. NAIC model laws (US): prompt payment compliance tracking by state and line of business, denial letter content validation against state requirements before sending, and documentation requirements per line tracked against claim records. Automated underwriting and claims decisions: every automated decision generates a plain-language explanation of the factors that drove the outcome, stored in the decision record for regulatory examination. Audit trail export: for regulatory examinations, the compliance audit trail compresses to a regulator-ready report from the claims and policy handling records without manual compilation. See also: AI governance and compliance automation.

Guidewire and Duck Creek integration

Integration layer between custom-built AI and automation components and your existing Guidewire ClaimCenter, PolicyCenter, or BillingCenter, or Duck Creek Claims, Policy, or Billing platforms. Use case: you've invested in a core platform but need AI-powered document extraction, fraud scoring, or compliance monitoring that the platform doesn't provide out of the box. The integration approach: API-first connections to your platform's REST or SOAP endpoints for reading policy and claim data, writing extracted fields, and triggering platform workflows from external events. Event-driven architecture where the AI component subscribes to platform events (new claim filed, FNOL received, document uploaded) and pushes results back to the platform record. Field mapping documented and tested against your platform configuration rather than against a generic schema, because every Guidewire or Duck Creek implementation is customised. Data synchronisation for high-volume batch scenarios where real-time API calls are impractical. We've built both Guidewire and Duck Creek integrations for clients who needed AI capabilities their platform couldn't deliver natively, without replacing the platform investment they'd already made.

What's the highest-cost manual process in your operation right now?

Tell us where your team loses the most time. We'll scope what it would take to automate it and what the before-and-after looks like.

How we deliver

Process

From problem to production

  1. Step 01
    01

    Discovery and scoping

    We map your current workflows, identify where manual work is highest-cost, assess your data and system landscape, and scope the build. Output: a clear specification of what we're building, which systems it connects to, what compliance requirements it needs to meet, and a fixed-cost proposal with milestone delivery dates. No development starts without a scope document and a price you've agreed.

  2. Step 02
    02

    Build and integrate

    We build the software in incremental milestones with working functionality you can review and test at each stage. Integrations with your existing systems are built and tested against your actual platform configuration. Compliance requirements are implemented in the build phase, not as a last-mile retrofit.

  3. Step 03
    03

    Testing and production deployment

    User acceptance testing against your real workflows, load testing for your transaction volumes, and compliance validation before go-live. We deploy to your infrastructure, document the system, hand over the codebase, and provide a walk-through for your team. Fixed-cost support retainer available post-launch.

Frequently asked questions

We build across the core insurance software categories: underwriting platforms with risk rules engines and decisioning audit trails, claims management systems from FNOL through settlement, policy administration platforms with product configurators and quote-bind-issue workflows, document intelligence pipelines for policies, claims evidence, and medical reports, and regulatory compliance systems for Solvency II, FCA Consumer Duty, and NAIC. We also build the integration layer between custom-built components and existing core platforms like Guidewire and Duck Creek. The scope depends on what you have, what's breaking, and where the business is losing the most time or money. We assess that in discovery before quoting.

The honest answer depends on your scale, your business rules complexity, and your budget. Guidewire and Duck Creek are mature platforms with deep insurance-specific functionality, pre-built regulatory compliance, and large implementation partner ecosystems. They make sense for mid-to-large insurers with the budget for licensing and implementation (typically $500K to multi-million dollar engagements). Custom development makes sense when your product structure is genuinely unusual, when your business rules can't be expressed cleanly in a configured platform, when you're a managing general agent or insurtech that needs to move faster than a large platform implementation allows, or when the cost of configuration exceeds the cost of building for your specific scope. We are honest about which fits your situation. We also build the integration layer that connects custom-built components to Guidewire or Duck Creek when a hybrid approach is the right answer.

FNOL automation covers the intake-to-system workflow: extracting structured data from incoming loss notices (phone transcripts, web forms, emails, mobile apps), validating policy coverage against the reported loss date and peril, populating your claims system fields automatically, classifying claim complexity for routing (simple to automated adjudication, complex to experienced adjusters), and generating the acknowledgement communication within minutes of intake. The automation handles the extraction, validation, and routing work that currently takes your team 20 to 45 minutes per FNOL manually. Your adjusters receive a pre-populated claim record rather than a raw loss notice to re-key. We scope the automation boundary clearly during discovery, defining what the system handles and where human judgment takes over, before any development starts.

We build insurance software with compliance requirements built in, not added after the fact. For EU-regulated insurers: Solvency II risk reporting, SCR calculation support, and audit trail requirements for automated decisions. For UK insurers: FCA Consumer Duty documentation, fair value assessment frameworks, and consumer outcome monitoring. For US insurers: NAIC model law requirements vary by state and line of business, but we cover prompt payment compliance tracking, denial letter requirement validation, and documentation requirements for personal and commercial lines. For automated underwriting and claims decisions specifically, we build the audit trail that explains the automated decision in plain language for regulatory examination, which is a requirement under FCA Consumer Duty and an emerging requirement under US state insurance regulations. We are not a legal compliance firm. For legal sign-off, you need your compliance team and external counsel. We build systems that make compliance operationally achievable.

A focused automation build (FNOL intake, a specific compliance workflow, or a single policy admin module) typically runs $50,000 to $80,000 in 10 to 14 weeks. A full policy administration platform or end-to-end claims management system typically runs $100,000 to $200,000 in 16 to 24 weeks. Document intelligence pipelines for a defined document set typically run $40,000 to $80,000. Cost is driven by the number of systems that need integration, business rules complexity, compliance scope, and whether you need a new user interface or API-only delivery. We give fixed-cost quotes for well-scoped projects after a discovery phase.

AI applies to insurance underwriting in two main ways: risk scoring and document processing. Risk scoring models trained on your historical policy data and loss outcomes generate a structured risk tier and the top contributing risk factors at quote, reducing underwriter time per submission and improving consistency on high-volume personal lines. Document processing extracts relevant data from broker submissions, inspection reports, and prior policy documents automatically, so underwriters work from structured data rather than re-reading raw documents. Both approaches operate as tools that support underwriter judgment, not as black boxes that replace it. The audit trail that explains the AI's scoring contribution is built in from the start. We assess which AI components fit your underwriting workflow and data maturity during discovery.

Data migration from legacy policy systems is one of the riskier parts of any insurance software replacement, and we treat it as a first-class workstream rather than an afterthought. The migration approach: data profiling to understand the actual shape of your legacy data (which fields are populated consistently, which are sparse, which have changed meaning over time), mapping from legacy schema to new schema with explicit decisions on how to handle gaps and inconsistencies, a test migration on a representative subset before the full migration to validate output quality, and parallel running where both systems are live for a period so your team can validate the migrated data against the source. Policy-level reconciliation reports confirm that premium, coverage, and term data matches before legacy decommissioning. For active claims in progress during migration, we design the cutover timing and data state to avoid losing claim history or adjuster notes.

Work with us

Tell us what you need. We'll tell you what it would take.

We scope Insurance Software Development in 30 minutes. You walk away with a clear cost, timeline, and approach. No commitment required.

  • Scope and cost agreed before work starts. No surprises. No obligation.
  • Working prototype within 3 weeks of kickoff.
  • Pay by milestone. You see progress before each invoice.
  • 60-day post-launch warranty. Bug fixes, UI tweaks, and deployment support. No retainer.
  • All conversations are NDA-protected.