Scanner producing 10,000 findings a month with no way to distinguish which 50 actually pose meaningful risk in your environment -- so nothing gets prioritised and nothing gets fixed faster than it would without the scanner?
Remediation tracked in a spreadsheet that the infrastructure team, dev team, and security team each maintain separately, with no single view of what is open, overdue, or disputed?
Vulnerability Management Software
Vulnerability scanners generate thousands of findings. Without a platform to apply business context -- asset criticality, exploitability, exposure -- every critical CVE looks equally urgent. Remediation teams receive an undifferentiated list and decide what to fix based on what is easiest. Six months later the same critical vulnerabilities are still open.
We build custom vulnerability management platforms that aggregate scan results from Tenable, Qualys, or Rapid7, apply risk-based prioritisation against your asset criticality, route remediation tasks to the right teams with SLA targets, and track fix rates against those targets -- replacing the Excel-based process most security teams still rely on.
Vulnerability scanner integration and aggregation -- pull findings from Tenable, Qualys, or Rapid7
Risk-based prioritisation -- asset criticality, exploitability, and business context applied to every finding
Remediation task routing -- findings routed to the right team with SLA targets and tracking
SLA compliance reporting -- fix rates by severity, team, and asset class for CISO-level visibility
RaftLabs builds custom vulnerability management software that aggregates scan results from Tenable, Qualys, or Rapid7, applies risk-based prioritisation against your asset criticality and business context, routes remediation tasks to infrastructure, development, and application teams with SLA targets attached, and tracks fix rates over time. We replace the Excel-based vulnerability tracking process most security teams still use with a platform that gives your security team real prioritisation data and gives your CISO a defensible view of remediation performance. Most vulnerability management software projects deliver in 10-16 weeks at a fixed cost.
100+Products shipped
·24+Industries served
·FixedCost delivery
·10-16Week delivery cycles
A scanner is not a vulnerability management programme
A vulnerability scanner tells you what is exposed. Vulnerability management is the operational programme that decides what to fix first, assigns that work to the right team, tracks whether it gets done, and reports on the programme's effectiveness to leadership. The scanner is a data source. The platform is everything that happens with that data.
Most security teams run vulnerability scanners and manage the output in spreadsheets or ticketing systems that weren't designed for vulnerability workflows. Asset criticality isn't applied systematically. Remediation is not tracked against SLA targets. The CISO's question -- are we getting better or worse? -- can't be answered from the data available. A custom vulnerability management platform changes that.
What we build
Vulnerability scanner integration and aggregation
API integration with Tenable.io, Tenable.sc, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, and other scanner platforms to pull finding data on a defined schedule or via webhook on scan completion. Finding deduplication across scanners for environments running multiple tools. Normalisation of severity scores, CVE references, and asset identifiers across scanner formats. Historical finding data retained so trends can be calculated -- not just a snapshot of the current scan. Integration with cloud-native scanning (AWS Inspector, Azure Defender, GCP Security Command Center) for cloud workload coverage alongside traditional network scanner data.
Asset inventory and criticality management
Asset inventory built from scanner discovery data, enriched with business context: asset owner, business unit, environment (production, staging, development), data classification, and criticality tier. Criticality scoring that reflects business impact -- a customer-facing production database is not the same risk as a development workstation even if they share a vulnerability. Asset grouping by technology stack, location, team ownership, and compliance scope. Asset lifecycle tracking: new assets appearing in scans, assets going offline, assets changing ownership. The asset context that makes vulnerability prioritisation meaningful rather than purely CVE-score-based.
Risk-based vulnerability prioritisation
Prioritisation scoring that combines CVSS severity with exploitability data (EPSS scores, known exploitation in the wild from CISA KEV), asset criticality, and network exposure. Findings ranked by actual risk in your environment rather than generic severity scores. Suppression rules for accepted risks and false positives that have been reviewed and documented. Exception management workflow for findings that cannot be remediated on standard SLA timelines, with required approvals and review intervals. Prioritised remediation queues by team, asset class, and compliance requirement. The signal-to-noise reduction that lets your remediation teams focus on findings that matter.
Remediation task routing and tracking
Automated remediation task creation routed to the responsible team based on asset owner, technology type, and finding category. Infrastructure vulnerabilities to the infrastructure team, application dependencies to the development team, cloud configuration findings to the cloud engineering team -- without security manually triaging and assigning each finding. Task tracking with status updates: open, in progress, remediated, accepted risk, false positive. Verification workflow that re-checks finding status from scanner data after the remediation team marks a task complete. Dispute resolution workflow for findings the remediation team believes are false positives. The closed loop between finding identification and confirmed remediation.
SLA compliance and fix rate reporting
SLA configuration by severity tier: critical vulnerabilities remediated within 15 days, high within 30 days, medium within 90 days, or whatever your policy defines. SLA compliance tracking per finding, per team, and in aggregate. Overdue finding alerts sent to team leads before SLA breach and to security management after breach. Fix rate metrics: percentage of findings remediated on time by severity and team over rolling time periods. CISO-level reporting dashboard showing programme metrics: mean time to remediate by severity, SLA compliance rate, open critical finding count trend, and vulnerability backlog age distribution. The reporting that answers whether the vulnerability management programme is improving.
Vulnerability trend analytics
Trend dashboards that show vulnerability posture over time, not just a current state snapshot. Critical finding count trending up or down. Mean time to remediate improving or degrading. New finding introduction rate versus remediation rate -- the net flow that determines whether the backlog is shrinking. Breakdown by team to identify where remediation velocity is lowest. Technology-level analysis showing which platforms or software stacks are generating the most risk. Asset exposure score tracking for your most critical assets. The analytics layer that turns raw scanner data into a security programme performance narrative.
Frequently asked questions
Scanner vendor platforms -- Tenable's dashboard, Qualys VMDR, InsightVM -- are strong at detection and basic reporting. They are limited at reflecting your specific business context: your asset criticality tiers, your remediation team structure, your SLA policy, and your compliance reporting requirements. They also don't aggregate well across multiple scanners. Custom vulnerability management makes sense when you run multiple scanners and need a unified view, when your remediation workflow requires routing to teams by asset owner or technology stack that the scanner platform doesn't support, or when your compliance reporting requirements need a specific format the scanner doesn't produce. We assess the build-versus-buy trade-off honestly during scoping.
Risk-based prioritisation combines multiple data sources into a single finding score that reflects actual risk in your environment. CVSS severity provides the baseline -- but a critical CVSS score on a vulnerability with no known public exploit, on an isolated development system with no external access, is less urgent than a high CVSS score on a vulnerability actively exploited in the wild, on a production system exposed to the internet. The scoring model combines CVSS, EPSS (exploit prediction scoring), CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue, network exposure (internet-facing vs internal), and your asset criticality tier. We configure the scoring weights with your security team during implementation so the prioritisation reflects your specific risk tolerance and asset landscape.
Task routing is based on asset ownership and vulnerability type. Assets are tagged with an owner team during asset inventory setup -- infrastructure team for servers and network devices, development team for application code dependencies, cloud engineering for cloud configuration findings. Vulnerability type further refines routing: OS-level vulnerabilities go to infrastructure, application dependency vulnerabilities (Log4j, npm packages) go to development. The routing rules are configured during implementation to match your actual team structure. New asset types and finding categories are mapped to teams as they appear. Findings without a clear owner are routed to a security team queue for manual assignment.
A focused vulnerability management tool -- scanner integration with risk-based prioritisation and a remediation tracking dashboard -- typically runs $20,000 to $60,000. A full platform with multi-scanner aggregation, asset inventory with criticality management, remediation task routing across multiple teams, SLA tracking, and executive reporting runs $60,000 to $140,000 depending on the number of scanner integrations, asset scale, and reporting requirements. We scope the project before pricing it. You get a fixed cost before development starts.
Security Compliance Software -- automated evidence collection, continuous control monitoring, and audit-ready platforms
Talk to us about your vulnerability management project.
Tell us your current scanner environment, team structure, and what the existing tracking process is missing. We'll design the platform and give you a fixed cost.
