Is your hardware refresh cycle coming up and the capital expenditure not justified for infrastructure that is already holding you back?
When you need to scale your application for demand spikes, how long does it take and what does it cost?
Your on-prem servers are aging infrastructure you are paying to maintain, secure, and replace on a cycle you cannot escape.
On-premises infrastructure has a fixed cost regardless of whether you use it: hardware refresh every 3-5 years, facilities costs, backup infrastructure, and the IT overhead of keeping it running. When a server fails at 2am, someone gets called. When you need to scale for a peak period, you are limited by what is in the rack.
We migrate businesses to cloud infrastructure on AWS, Azure, or GCP. From assessment and planning through application migration, data migration, and post-migration optimisation. The transition from infrastructure you manage to infrastructure that manages itself.
Cloud readiness assessment that identifies what migrates as-is and what needs re-architecting first
Application and database migration executed in phases to minimise disruption to your operations
Infrastructure-as-code delivery so your cloud environment is reproducible, version-controlled, and auditable
Post-migration cost optimisation that prevents cloud spend from replacing your on-prem bill with a larger one
RaftLabs provides cloud migration services including cloud readiness assessments, lift-and-shift migrations for applications moving as-is, application re-architecting for cloud-native deployment, database migrations to managed cloud database services, infrastructure-as-code using Terraform, multi-cloud and hybrid cloud architecture design, and post-migration cost optimisation. Cloud migration engagements are scoped at a fixed price after an assessment phase that evaluates your current infrastructure, application dependencies, and target cloud environment.
The cost structure you are paying for versus the one that is available to you
On-premises infrastructure has a fixed cost profile: capital expenditure on hardware, facilities (power, cooling, physical security), IT time for maintenance and upgrades, and the operational burden of running your own infrastructure. This cost is constant whether you are at 20% utilisation or 100%.
Cloud infrastructure has a variable cost profile: you pay for what you use. Scaling up for demand peaks does not require a hardware purchase. Scaling down after a migration does not leave you with idle capacity. Backup, disaster recovery, and geographic redundancy are built-in services rather than separate infrastructure projects.
The migration is a project. The operational savings are permanent.
What we build
Cloud readiness assessment
A structured assessment of your current infrastructure, applications, and data before migration starts. Application dependency mapping to understand what connects to what and what order migration must follow. Database sizing and migration complexity assessment. Network topology documentation. Security and compliance requirements identification. Cost modelling for the target cloud environment. The assessment produces a migration roadmap with phasing, estimated effort, and risk areas identified before you commit to the migration project. No surprises mid-migration.
Application migration
Application migration from on-premises servers to cloud infrastructure. Lift-and-shift migration for stable applications moving as-is to cloud VMs. Containerisation of applications for deployment on Kubernetes for teams ready to move to a more operationally efficient runtime. Configuration management using Ansible or similar so application configuration is code, not manual server setup. Load balancer and auto-scaling configuration for applications that need elastic capacity. SSL certificate migration and DNS cutover. Post-migration smoke testing against a defined test plan before the old environment is decommissioned.
Database migration
Relational database migration from on-premises servers to managed cloud database services: RDS, Cloud SQL, Azure Database, or self-managed cloud databases. PostgreSQL, MySQL, MSSQL, Oracle, and MongoDB supported. Schema migration with compatibility validation. Data migration using replication for continuous sync during the migration window. Cutover using a planned low-traffic window with replication lag minimised before switchover. Full data validation comparing source and destination post-migration. Managed database configuration for automated backups, point-in-time recovery, and read replicas.
Infrastructure as code
Cloud infrastructure defined and deployed using Terraform. Every resource -- compute, networking, storage, security groups, IAM, DNS -- defined in version-controlled code rather than created manually through the console. Infrastructure that is reproducible, auditable, and diffable. Environments (development, staging, production) created from the same codebase with environment-specific configuration. State managed in remote backend (S3 with DynamoDB locking or Terraform Cloud). Delivery means your team inherits infrastructure they can modify, extend, and destroy-and-recreate rather than a black box of manually configured resources.
Network and security architecture
Cloud network architecture designed with security and least-privilege access as the starting point. VPC design with public and private subnet separation. Security group and network ACL configuration. IAM role design with minimal required permissions for each service. Secrets management using AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, or Google Secret Manager instead of hardcoded credentials. VPN or Direct Connect for hybrid architectures that need private connectivity between cloud and remaining on-premises systems. Logging, audit trails, and alerting configured from day one.
Cost optimisation
Cloud cost management from the first day of migration rather than after the bill arrives. Right-sizing compute resources based on actual utilisation, not peak theoretical capacity. Reserved instance and savings plan purchasing recommendations for stable workloads. Auto-scaling configuration for variable workloads so you do not pay for idle capacity. S3 storage lifecycle policies. CloudWatch, Azure Monitor, or GCP Monitoring configured with cost anomaly alerts. Monthly cost review during the first three months post-migration to identify optimisation opportunities as real usage patterns emerge. Cloud cost typically drops 20-40% below equivalent on-prem spend for the same workload within 12 months of optimisation.
When is your next hardware refresh due, and what would you save by not doing it?
Bring us your current infrastructure details and operational constraints. We will assess the migration scope and give you an honest cost and timeline estimate.
Related services
DevOps as a Service -- CI/CD, containerisation, and infrastructure automation post-migration
Data Engineering -- data pipelines that live in the cloud environment you migrate to
Legacy Modernisation -- re-architecting legacy applications alongside or after migration
Software Modernisation -- modernising the applications you migrate to the cloud
Enterprise Software Development -- building new applications for your cloud environment
Frequently asked questions
Lift-and-shift (also called rehosting) moves your existing application to cloud infrastructure without changing the application itself. Your application runs on cloud VMs instead of physical servers. It gets the operational benefits of cloud -- no hardware to manage, easier backup, faster provisioning -- without the full cost and disruption of rebuilding the application. Lift-and-shift is faster, lower risk, and lower cost than a full re-architecture. It is the right approach for applications that are stable, not cloud-optimised, and where the operational benefits of cloud are the primary goal. Cloud-native migration (re-platforming or re-architecting) redesigns the application to use managed cloud services: containerisation with Kubernetes, serverless functions for appropriate workloads, managed databases instead of self-managed database servers, and auto-scaling infrastructure. It costs more and takes longer than lift-and-shift but delivers better ongoing scalability, resilience, and operational efficiency. For most migrations, we recommend a phased approach: lift-and-shift first to get off on-prem, then re-platform specific components where the cost-benefit of redesigning is clear.
Data migration is the highest-risk part of any cloud migration. Our approach has four phases. Assessment: we document every database, its size, schema, relationships, and data quality issues before touching anything. Planning: we design the migration strategy for each database -- which managed service it moves to, the migration method (dump and restore, CDC replication, or native migration tooling), and the cutover plan. Validation: we run the migration in a staging environment and run automated validation checks that compare row counts, checksums, and data samples between source and destination. Cutover: the production cutover uses a defined runbook with rollback steps if any validation check fails at any point. Data migration validation is not a manual spot-check. It is automated comparison of source and destination at the record level. We do not declare migration complete until validation passes.
AWS is the most mature platform with the broadest service selection and the largest ecosystem of third-party tools and integration partners. It is the default choice for organisations without a strong existing relationship with Microsoft or Google. Azure is the natural fit for organisations deep in the Microsoft ecosystem: Windows Server, Active Directory, MSSQL, Office 365. The integration between Azure and Microsoft's enterprise tools is tighter than what AWS or GCP offers, and licensing benefits for existing Microsoft customers are meaningful. GCP has the strongest managed data and analytics services (BigQuery, Dataflow, Vertex AI) and is worth considering for organisations where data processing and AI are central workloads. We assess your existing infrastructure, team expertise, existing licensing agreements, and primary use cases before recommending a platform. The recommendation is based on what fits your situation, not our familiarity.
For most migrations, taking systems offline for the full migration duration is not acceptable. We use phased migration and cutover strategies that minimise downtime. For applications, we run source and destination in parallel during a validation period and switch traffic when confidence is high, then decommission the source. For databases, we use replication: the destination database receives an ongoing stream of changes from the source until the cutover moment, at which point the replication lag is typically seconds. The cutover window -- when write traffic switches from source to destination -- is planned for the lowest-traffic period and is measured in minutes, not hours. The specific cutover strategy depends on your application architecture, acceptable downtime window, and business criticality. We design and document the cutover plan before migration starts and dry-run it in a staging environment.