• Evidence requests going out by email with no visibility into whether they have been received, acknowledged, or completed -- and the audit deadline approaching?

  • Findings from the last three audits in three separate spreadsheets with no way to see whether the same control weakness is recurring across audit cycles?

Audit Management Software

Internal audit teams spend a disproportionate share of their time on logistics -- scheduling audits, chasing evidence requests by email, tracking findings across spreadsheets, and assembling reports from data that is never quite in the same place twice. The judgment work -- assessing risk, evaluating control effectiveness, recommending remediation -- is the work that requires trained auditors. The logistics work does not.
We build custom audit management platforms for internal audit teams, external audit preparation, and ongoing compliance monitoring. Audit scheduling, evidence request workflows, finding management, remediation tracking, and the historical audit record that regulators and auditors need to see.

  • Audit scheduling and planning workflow that tracks every audit from initiation through report issue -- no audit falling through the gaps

  • Evidence request and collection management that replaces email chains with a tracked workflow and a deadline every request owner can see

  • Finding and remediation tracking so every identified issue has an owner, a due date, and a documented closure record

  • Cross-audit analysis that surfaces patterns across audits -- recurring findings, high-risk areas, and systemic control weaknesses

RaftLabs builds custom audit management software for internal audit teams and compliance functions -- audit planning and scheduling, evidence request and collection workflows, finding management and risk tracking, remediation deadline management, automated audit report generation, and historical audit trail with cross-audit analysis. Custom audit management software typically costs $25,000 to $70,000 depending on the number of audits managed, integration requirements, and the scope of reporting and analytics.

Vodafone
Aldi
Nike
Microsoft
Heineken
Cisco
Calorgas
Energia Rewards
GE
Bank of America
T-Mobile
Valero
Techstars
East Ventures

The audit backlog is usually not a headcount problem. It is a logistics problem. Audit teams that manage their work on spreadsheets and email spend a significant portion of their time coordinating -- scheduling, chasing, following up -- rather than auditing. The same team with better tooling completes more audits, with better documentation, and produces reports that are consistent rather than dependent on which auditor was assigned.

Audit management software does not replace the auditor's judgment. It removes the coordination overhead that currently competes with judgment for the same time and attention.

What we build

Audit planning and scheduling workflow

Audit plan management covering the full cycle from risk-based audit selection through scheduling, resource assignment, and completion tracking. Annual audit plan template with risk rating by audit area, mapped to available audit days and team capacity. Individual audit initiation workflow: scope definition, auditee notification, fieldwork period, and report issue deadline tracked in a single record. Resource allocation across concurrent audits to prevent over-scheduling. Audit progress tracking -- planning, fieldwork, reporting, and follow-up -- with status visible to audit leadership without requiring status meetings. The audit plan that does not lose audits between cycles and does not require a senior auditor to hold the schedule in their head.

Evidence request and collection management

Structured evidence request and collection workflow replacing email-based evidence gathering. Evidence requests created in the system with named owners, due dates, and the specific documentation required. Automated reminders to request owners as due dates approach and at overdue intervals. Auditee portal where evidence owners upload documents directly against specific requests -- no email attachments scattered across inboxes. Real-time completion status visible to the audit team showing outstanding requests, received items, and items returned for clarification. Evidence items linked to the specific control, process, or finding they support. The evidence collection workflow that arrives at fieldwork completion with a complete, documented evidence set rather than a partial one.

Finding management and risk tracking

Structured finding management from identification through closure. Each finding recorded with the control or process it relates to, the risk rating, the auditor's observation, the criteria violated, and the recommended remediation. Finding status tracked: draft, issued, management response received, remediation in progress, evidence of closure submitted, closed. Risk rating consistency enforced by rating criteria embedded in the finding template. Finding register across all active and historical audits -- queryable by audit area, risk rating, status, and time open. Finding report generation for the audit report and for the audit committee finding summary. The finding record that has a clear chain from observation to closure.

Remediation workflow and due date tracking

Remediation commitment tracking from management response through evidence of closure. Management responses captured directly in the system with the committed remediation action and due date. Automated reminders to remediation owners as due dates approach. Overdue remediation escalation alerts to audit leadership and senior management. Evidence of remediation submitted and reviewed by the audit team before finding closure. Extended due dates documented with the reason for extension. The remediation workflow that prevents closed-on-paper findings from remaining open in practice -- and demonstrates to regulators that the audit function follows through.

Audit report generation

Automated audit report generation from the fieldwork record -- scope, methodology, findings, risk ratings, and management responses assembled from the data in the system rather than written from scratch for each audit. Report templates for different audit types and audiences: detailed internal audit reports for operational management, executive summary reports for the audit committee, and regulator-ready reports for external submission. Finding tables populated automatically from the finding register. Management response columns populated from captured management responses. Report version control and approval workflow before issuance. The audit report that takes hours to generate from the fieldwork record rather than days to write from scratch.

Historical audit trail and cross-audit analysis

Complete historical audit record with every audit, finding, remediation commitment, and closure documented and queryable. Cross-audit analysis that identifies patterns: which control areas produce the most findings, which findings recur across audit cycles, which business units have the highest proportion of overdue remediations, and which risk areas are improving or deteriorating over time. Heat map visualisation of audit coverage by risk area and time period -- showing which areas have been audited recently and which have not been covered in the plan. Audit committee reporting that summarises the audit program's output across the full year: audits completed, findings by risk rating, remediation status, and coverage against the annual plan.

How much of your audit team's time goes into coordination rather than auditing?

Tell us your audit volume, current process, and the specific workflow problems. We will scope the platform that removes the coordination overhead.

Frequently asked questions

Audit management software is the operational platform for teams that plan, execute, and report on audits -- whether internal audit functions conducting periodic risk-based audits of business processes, compliance teams preparing for external audits (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA), or regulated entities managing ongoing regulatory review cycles. Users are typically internal auditors, compliance managers, and the audit committee or board function that receives audit reports. The core problems the software solves: keeping multiple concurrent audits organised and on schedule, managing the flow of evidence requests between the audit team and the auditees who provide evidence, tracking findings and remediation commitments through to closure, and producing consistent audit reports without assembling them manually each time. Teams that manage more than 5-10 audits per year on spreadsheets typically find the overhead of the manual process is limiting how many audits they can conduct with the same headcount.

Traditional evidence request management works like this: an auditor emails a list of requested documents to the auditee, the auditee emails back some of them, the auditor follows up on the missing ones, the auditee sends more, and at some point the auditor has enough evidence to proceed. There is no shared view of what has been provided and what is outstanding, no automatic reminders, and no record of when each item was received. Automated evidence request management works differently: each request is a tracked item with a named owner, a due date, and a status. Owners receive automated reminders as due dates approach. The audit team sees completion status across all requests in real time. Submitted evidence is attached directly to the request record and linked to the control or process being tested. The auditor spends time reviewing evidence rather than tracking down whether it has been sent. For a typical financial or compliance audit, this reduces evidence collection time by 30-50% and eliminates the end-of-audit scramble for missing items.

Yes. Audit management software often needs to sit alongside existing GRC (governance, risk, and compliance) platforms rather than replace them -- the GRC platform holds the risk register and control framework while the audit management system handles the operational workflow of planning and executing audits. We build integrations between the audit management platform and existing GRC tools (ServiceNow GRC, Archer, LogicGate), ITSM platforms (ServiceNow, Jira), and document management systems (SharePoint, Confluence) to avoid duplicating records across systems. Where an existing GRC platform exists, we scope the integration requirements during discovery to ensure the audit management tool extends the existing investment rather than competing with it. We also build standalone audit management platforms for organisations that do not have an existing GRC tool and want a purpose-built audit workflow system.

Custom audit management software typically runs $25,000 to $70,000. At the lower end: an audit planning and scheduling module, evidence request workflow with reminders, finding and remediation tracking, and a basic audit report template. At the upper end: multi-audit-type support, integration with existing GRC or ITSM platforms, role-based access for auditees and audit committee, advanced analytics with cross-audit pattern analysis, and custom report formats for different audiences (audit committee, board, regulators). Cost is primarily driven by the number of integrations required, the complexity of the reporting requirements, and whether the platform needs to support multiple audit types with different workflows and evidence requirements. We scope the engagement during a discovery phase that maps your current audit process, volume, and the specific workflow problems the platform needs to solve.