Your attorneys bill 1,900 hours a year. Too many of those hours are admin.

Any workflow that follows a consistent pattern and doesn't require attorney judgment at every step. Document drafting is the obvious one — most firms use the same base agreements, motions, and letters repeatedly, with variables swapped in from matter data. An automation system drafts the document from the template, populates it with client and matter details, and sends it for attorney review in seconds instead of thirty minutes. Client intake is another high-value target: structured intake forms that collect the information your team actually needs, route the matter to the right attorney, and trigger the conflict check automatically. Deadline tracking — statute of limitations dates, court filing deadlines, response windows — should never live in a spreadsheet. It should be in a system with automated reminders that escalates when something is approaching and no one has acted on it. Billing entry collection, time tracking, and invoice generation are also strong targets because the cost of imprecision is direct revenue leakage.

Yes. Most legal automation work we do sits on top of existing systems rather than replacing them. We integrate with Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther, Filevine, NetDocuments, iManage, and most systems with an API. We also integrate with Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace for document generation and email-based triggers. The goal is automation that works within tools your team already uses — not another system they have to remember to open. If you're running something non-standard or proprietary, we assess integration feasibility before the engagement starts.

Document drafting automation generates the first draft — populated from your approved template library and the matter's data record. Every generated document goes to an attorney for review before it goes anywhere. The automation eliminates the assembly work, not the judgment. For high-volume document types like NDAs, engagement letters, demand letters, or standard discovery responses, the time savings per document range from 20 to 45 minutes. Across a firm handling hundreds of matters, that compounds into thousands of billable hours recovered per year. We also build clause libraries so attorneys can insert pre-approved language without drafting from scratch each time.

Legal data is among the most sensitive we work with, and we treat it accordingly. Every system we build uses encrypted storage and transit, strict role-based access controls, and comprehensive audit logging — who accessed what matter data and when. We design for attorney-client privilege protection by ensuring that data access patterns match your firm's actual role structure. For firms with specific compliance requirements, including state bar rules on data residency or handling, we scope those requirements in the discovery phase before any build commitment is made. You receive a full security architecture document as part of project delivery.