Running grant applications through email and spreadsheets so that assessment scores are inconsistent between officers, borderline decisions are not documented, and an FOI request on the decision-making process requires weeks of email archaeology to answer?
Managing grant compliance after award through a combination of email reminders and spreadsheet trackers, and finding that milestones are missed and grant conditions are not enforced because there is no system prompting the programme manager to follow up?
Government Grant Administration Software
Public grant programmes -- community funding rounds, capital grants, regeneration funds, innovation grants -- involve the same core challenge: a high volume of applications needs to be assessed consistently, decisions need to be defensible and auditable, awards need to be monitored for compliance, and the evidence trail needs to survive a Freedom of Information request or a National Audit Office examination.
We build custom grant administration software for government bodies distributing public funds -- from the online portal that applicants use to submit bids, to the assessment and award management tools that programme managers use to make decisions, monitor compliance, and report to funders.
Online application portal with eligibility pre-screening, structured application forms, document upload, and applicant tracking
Officer assessment workflow with scoring, panel review, and decision recording -- every assessment step documented for audit
Award management with grant condition tracking, milestone monitoring, payment scheduling, and variation management
Audit-ready reporting showing every application, every assessment score, every payment, and every compliance check
RaftLabs builds custom grant administration software for local authorities, regional development bodies, and central government departments distributing public funds. A government grant administration platform covers the online application portal for applicants, the officer assessment and panel review workflow, award management with condition tracking, grantee progress reporting, payment scheduling, and the audit-ready reporting that public sector grant programmes require. Most grant administration projects deliver in 12 to 18 weeks at a fixed, agreed cost.
100+Software products shipped
·FixedCost delivery
·12-18Week delivery cycles
·WCAG 2.1AA accessibility compliance
When public grant decisions need to be transparent and defensible
Public grant programmes carry accountability obligations that commercial grant-making does not. The decisions are subject to Freedom of Information requests. The assessment process may be examined by an auditor, an ombudsman, or a parliamentary committee. Applicants who are unsuccessful may challenge the decision and ask for the scoring rationale. All of this requires that the assessment process is not just consistent but documented -- every score, every comment, every panel decision, and every communication with applicants captured in a system that can produce the evidence on demand.
We build grant administration software for government bodies whose programme design and accountability obligations require more than a form builder and a spreadsheet. We understand the specific requirements of public sector grant administration -- the eligibility criteria management, the conflict of interest controls, the State Aid or subsidy control requirements, and the audit evidence trail that public money demands. We have built grant administration and funding management platforms for complex, multi-programme environments.
What we build
Online application portal
Application portal for grant applicants with eligibility pre-screening questions that identify ineligible applicants before they invest time in a full application -- saving programme officer time reviewing applications that should never have been submitted. Structured application form covering the programme's assessment criteria -- the project description, the outputs and outcomes, the project team, the budget, and any other information the programme requires -- with conditional sections that only appear when relevant to the applicant's project type. Document upload for supporting evidence -- accounts, CVs, match funding letters, planning permissions -- with the required documents for each programme configured and the applicant notified at submission if any required document is missing. Save and return so applicants can work on their application over multiple sessions rather than completing it in a single sitting. Application reference number and confirmation email generated at submission, with the applicant able to track the status of their application through the portal without contacting the programme team.
Assessment and scoring workflow
Assessment workflow configured to the programme's assessment process -- individual officer assessment followed by panel moderation, or direct panel assessment, or a multi-stage process with initial sift, detailed assessment, and final panel. Scoring framework built into the assessment form with the criteria, the maximum score for each criterion, and any minimum score thresholds configured to the programme's scoring methodology. Assessor assignment with conflict of interest declaration required before an assessor can access an application -- the assessor confirms they have no conflict of interest, and any declared conflict is recorded and the application reassigned. Assessor feedback entered through a structured form so the rationale for each score is documented in the system rather than in a separate note or email. Panel review view showing the scores and feedback from all assessors alongside each other, with the panel moderating scores and documenting the rationale for any moderation. Funding recommendation generated from the panel outcome, routed to the decision-maker for approval.
Decision management and communication
Award decision recorded in the system with the award amount, any conditions attached to the award, and the decision rationale. Decision letter generated from a template with the applicant's details, the award amount, the conditions, and the required next steps populated from the system record. Rejection letter generated with the scoring rationale and any right of appeal documented, produced from the system record rather than drafted individually for each applicant. Waitlist management for programmes where applications are ranked and funded to the available budget, with waitlisted applicants notified of their position and promoted to funded status when budget becomes available through withdrawal or underspend. Applicant query management for applicants who contact the programme team with questions about their application or the decision -- the response recorded in the application record so the programme team has a complete record of every communication with each applicant.
Award management and condition tracking
Grant award record covering the full award lifecycle from offer letter through project delivery to final claim and closure. Grant conditions recorded at the point of award -- the specific conditions attached to this award, not just the standard programme conditions -- with the condition type, the evidence required to demonstrate compliance, and the due date for each condition. Milestone schedule for projects with phased delivery -- the outputs, the spend, or the evidence required at each milestone, with the due dates visible to both the grantee and the programme manager. Variation management for awards where the project scope, budget, or timeline changes during delivery -- the variation request submitted by the grantee, assessed by the programme officer, and approved or rejected with the decision and rationale recorded. Clawback recording for awards where conditions are not met and full or partial recovery of the grant is required, with the recovery amount, the reason, and the outcome of the recovery process documented.
Grantee progress reporting
Grantee portal where funded organisations submit their progress reports, claim forms, and evidence at the configured intervals -- quarterly progress reports, milestone claim submissions, or interim and final reports depending on the programme structure. Progress report template configured to the programme's monitoring framework -- the outputs to be reported, the spend to be reconciled against the budget, the evidence to be uploaded, and any qualitative update required. Automatic reminder sent to grantees approaching a reporting deadline, with escalation to the programme manager if the report is not submitted by the deadline. Programme officer review workflow for assessing submitted reports and claims -- the officer records their assessment, flags any issues, and approves or queries the submission. Payment authorisation triggered by approval of a claim submission, with the payment amount, the payment date, and the authorising officer recorded for the audit trail.
Audit trail and programme reporting
Complete audit trail for every application, assessment, decision, award, and compliance interaction -- every action recorded with the user, the timestamp, and the content of the action. FOI readiness report for a specific application showing the complete record of every assessment score, every assessor comment, every panel decision, and every communication -- the report that satisfies an FOI request without requiring manual email archaeology. Programme performance report showing total applications received, total assessed, total funded, total committed, total paid, and total grant spend against programme budget -- for programme managers, senior leaders, and the funder or government department overseeing the programme. Subsidy control recording for programmes subject to UK subsidy control or EU State Aid rules -- the award amount, the applicable scheme, the cumulative subsidy to the recipient, and the recording required under the programme's subsidy basis. Data export in standard formats for programmes that report to central government funders or are subject to external audit.
Frequently asked questions
Yes. Most government grant administration platforms need to support multiple programmes running simultaneously, each with different eligibility criteria, different application forms, different assessment frameworks, and different monitoring requirements. We build the system with a programme configuration layer so each programme has its own eligibility rules, application form, scoring criteria, and monitoring framework -- managed by the programme team without requiring developer involvement when a new programme is launched or an existing programme's criteria change. Assessment forms, scoring frameworks, and monitoring templates are all configurable through the programme management interface.
Conflict of interest management is built into the assessment workflow. Before an assessor or panel member can access an application, the system requires them to confirm whether they have a conflict of interest with the applicant organisation -- a financial interest, a personal relationship, or any other interest that could compromise the assessment. Any declared conflict is recorded against the application and the assessor is excluded from that application's assessment. The conflict of interest declaration history is retained for every assessor for every application they have assessed, forming part of the audit trail. For programmes with a pre-assessment conflict check -- where assessors declare conflicts against the full application list before assessment begins -- we build the bulk declaration workflow and the automated application reassignment.
For programmes where awards are subject to UK subsidy control or residual EU State Aid obligations, we build the subsidy recording and monitoring into the award management module. The award details -- the recipient, the award amount, the applicable scheme or de minimis basis, and the cumulative subsidy to the recipient from all sources -- are recorded at the point of award in the format required for the programme's subsidy control compliance. For programmes using a specific approved scheme, the scheme reference is recorded against each award. Cumulative subsidy tracking helps programme officers identify recipients approaching or exceeding the de minimis threshold. The subsidy register extract is available in the format required for the programme's transparency publication obligations.
A grant administration platform for a single programme -- online application portal, officer assessment workflow, award management, and grantee progress reporting -- typically runs $40,000 to $75,000 depending on the complexity of the assessment framework and the monitoring requirements. A platform covering multiple programmes with a shared infrastructure, subsidy control recording, and advanced programme performance reporting typically runs $75,000 to $150,000. We scope every project before pricing. Fixed cost only.
Talk to us about your grant administration project.
Tell us about your programme -- the application volume, the assessment process, the monitoring requirements, and the audit obligations. We'll scope a system that handles the full grant lifecycle.