Performance reports for the scrutiny committee requiring two days of analyst time every quarter to compile because the data is held in three different systems that need to be manually reconciled before any report can be produced?
Statutory performance returns for central government requiring a manual extraction and reformatting exercise each time because the case management system produces data in a format that doesn't match the return specification?
Government Analytics and Performance Reporting Software
Local authorities produce an enormous volume of performance data -- from operational case management systems, from finance systems, from HR systems -- and spend a significant amount of analyst time extracting, reconciling, and reformatting it every time a report is needed. The data exists. The problem is that it is in the wrong systems, in the wrong format, and too slow to produce when an elected member, an inspectorate, or a government department asks for it.
We build custom government analytics platforms that connect your operational systems and produce the performance reporting that senior leaders, elected members, and statutory partners need -- live KPI dashboards, statutory returns, open data publications, and financial performance reporting -- without a manual extraction process every reporting cycle.
Live KPI dashboards for senior leaders, service heads, and elected members built from connected operational data
Statutory performance reporting in the format required for central government returns and inspectorate monitoring
Open data publishing tools for transparency obligations with automated refresh from source systems
Financial performance reporting linking service delivery outputs to budget spend by cost centre
RaftLabs builds custom government analytics and performance reporting software for local authorities, regional agencies, and central government departments. We connect operational systems -- case management, permits, finance, HR -- into a unified analytics layer that produces KPI dashboards for senior leaders and elected members, statutory performance returns for central government, open data publications for transparency obligations, and financial performance reports for budget holders. Most government analytics projects deliver in 10 to 14 weeks at a fixed, agreed cost.
100+Software products shipped
·FixedCost delivery
·10-14Week delivery cycles
·WCAG 2.1AA accessibility compliance
When performance data is in the right systems but the wrong shape
Government performance data problems are rarely data availability problems. Most local authorities have the relevant data -- in the case management system, the finance system, the HR system, the permits system. The problem is that the data is in different systems with different data models, updated at different frequencies, and reported in formats that don't match the questions elected members, senior leaders, or statutory partners are actually asking. Reconciling these systems manually to produce a quarterly performance report is slow, error-prone, and occupies analyst capacity that could be spent on more valuable work.
We build government analytics platforms that connect your existing operational systems and transform the data into the reporting that each audience needs -- live KPI dashboards for the senior leadership team, service-level reporting for service heads, statutory returns for central government, and open data publications for the transparency obligations that local authorities carry. The analytics layer sits on top of your existing systems without replacing them, and produces outputs that are current and consistent without a manual extraction process each reporting cycle.
What we build
Executive and member dashboards
KPI dashboard for the chief executive, the senior leadership team, and elected members -- showing the metrics that matter for strategic oversight without the operational detail that belongs in the service manager's view. Council plan delivery tracking with the current status of each commitment and the evidence for the assessment drawn from the operational data rather than from a manual self-assessment exercise. Red, amber, green status for each performance area with the underlying data accessible to anyone who wants to understand the rating rather than just seeing the colour. Trend data for each KPI showing the direction of travel over the last four to eight quarters so the leadership team can see whether performance is improving, declining, or stable. Alert configuration so senior leaders and service heads are notified when a KPI drops below a threshold or a statutory target is at risk of being missed. Mobile-accessible dashboard so elected members can access the performance data on any device without requiring a desktop login.
Service performance reporting
Service-level performance dashboard for service heads and team managers showing the operational metrics for their service area -- caseload levels, processing times, statutory deadline compliance, staff absence, and budget versus actual spend. Drill-down from the service-level summary to the underlying case or transaction data so a service manager can see not just the overall processing time but which cases or case types are driving the average. Benchmarking against national data where national benchmarks are available -- the LGA benchmarking data for local authority services, the NHS benchmarking data for public health services -- so performance is assessed against sector norms rather than only against the authority's own history. Target setting and tracking with the service targets for each KPI visible alongside the actual performance so the service head can see at a glance whether the service is on track. Exception reports showing the cases, transactions, or decisions that are outside the normal parameters -- the cases past their statutory deadline, the complaints not responded to within target, the licence renewals not processed before expiry.
Statutory performance returns
Statutory return data extraction in the format required for each of the central government data collections that apply to the authority's services -- the Single Data List returns, the Children in Need census, the adult social care outcomes framework, the REIT return for housing, the BVPI indicators for housing and planning, and any other returns required by the relevant government department or inspectorate. The data extracted from the live operational systems rather than compiled manually, so the return reflects the current state of the service at the extraction date without requiring the data to be rekeyed from system reports into a submission template. Validation checks on the extracted data before submission -- range checks, cross-validation between related data items, and comparison with the prior year return -- so data quality issues are caught before the return is submitted rather than after the government department flags them. Return submission history showing every submission made, the data submitted, and the date of submission, accessible for audit purposes.
Open data publishing
Open data publication platform for local authorities with obligations to publish data for transparency -- the spending over threshold data, the senior pay data, the contracts register, the planning application data, the permit register, and any other datasets included in the authority's publication scheme or required by the Local Government Transparency Code. Data published in open formats -- CSV, JSON, and where appropriate GeoJSON for spatial data -- accessible without registration and downloadable without restrictions. Automated refresh from the source systems at the configured frequency so published data is current without a manual extract and upload process each time. Dataset metadata in the format required for data.gov.uk or the authority's own open data portal. Data quality checks at each refresh to identify records that would fail validation before they are published. Access analytics showing which datasets are being downloaded most frequently and from which types of organisation, for the authority's open data impact reporting.
Financial performance reporting
Financial performance dashboard connecting the finance system data to the service delivery data so budget holders can see their spend against budget in the context of the service outputs being delivered. Budget versus actual reporting at the service, cost centre, and subjective level with the variance explained by spending decisions, demand changes, and underspends or overspends in specific cost categories. Capital programme monitoring with project-level spend against approval, forecast outturn, and slippage reporting for the programmes in the authority's capital programme. Savings tracker showing the revenue savings approved in the budget process, the implementation status of each saving, and the financial impact of any savings that are delayed or unachieved. Reserves analysis showing the authority's reserves position and the movements in each reserve fund over the financial year. Outturn forecasting at key points in the financial year -- month three, month six, month nine -- with the forecast outturn for the full year projected from the year-to-date spend and the known commitments.
Data integration and governance
Data integration layer connecting the operational systems -- case management, permits, finance, HR, customer contact -- into a unified data model from which all the analytics outputs are built. Data quality monitoring that identifies discrepancies between source systems, flags records with missing or inconsistent data, and produces a data quality report for the analytics lead before each major reporting cycle. Refresh frequency configured to the cadence each dataset requires -- daily refresh for operational dashboards, weekly for case management reporting, monthly for financial performance, quarterly for statutory returns. Data lineage documentation so the analytics team can explain where every number in every report comes from and how it is calculated -- the documentation that answers the question "where does this number come from?" when an elected member or an auditor challenges a figure. Data access controls so each user group sees the data they are authorised to see -- elected members see the corporate dashboards, service heads see their own service data, and the finance team sees the financial reporting without seeing personal data from the case management system.
Frequently asked questions
We connect to the operational systems where your performance data lives -- typically a case management system, a finance system, an HR system, a permits and licensing system, and a customer contact or CRM system. Where systems have REST APIs, we connect directly. Where systems provide only database access or file exports, we build the integration using those methods. Legacy systems without modern connectivity options are handled through file-based ingestion pipelines. We have experience connecting to a range of local authority systems, including older systems that predate modern API standards. The data sources in scope are agreed during the discovery phase, and the integration architecture is designed before development begins.
Yes. The analytics platform is designed as a reporting layer that sits on top of your existing operational systems rather than replacing them. The operational systems remain the authoritative sources for the data -- HR records stay in the HR system, case records stay in the case management system -- and the analytics platform reads from those sources to produce the reporting. This means the analytics platform can be built and deployed without disrupting the operational systems or requiring operational staff to change how they work. The benefit is that reporting is produced from the same data that operational staff are already maintaining, rather than from a separate dataset that has to be maintained in parallel.
Government analytics frequently involves personal data -- case records, contact records, HR data. The analytics platform is designed with data minimisation as a principle: where an analytical output can be produced from aggregated data, we do not expose individual records in the analytics interface. Where individual records need to be accessible for drill-down -- for example, a service manager who needs to see which specific cases are past their statutory deadline -- the access is controlled by role and every access is logged. Anonymisation and pseudonymisation are applied where the analytical requirement can be met without full personal data. We produce a Data Protection Impact Assessment for analytics platforms that process personal data and design the retention and deletion controls to comply with your data retention schedule.
An analytics platform connecting two to three data sources and producing executive dashboards, service performance reporting, and statutory return extracts typically runs $35,000 to $70,000. A full platform connecting five or more data sources, with open data publishing, financial performance reporting, and a self-service report builder for service managers, typically runs $65,000 to $140,000. We scope every project before pricing. Fixed cost only.
Talk to us about your government analytics project.
Tell us which data sources you need to connect, which reports you currently produce manually, and what your statutory reporting obligations are. We'll design an analytics platform that produces the answers you need.